Leit til a lkna og lkna ea "search and kill"? - hvort viljum vi? Hva vill kirkjan?

Hringurinn, kvenflag,hefur enn n af rausnarhug gefi Landsptalanum drmt rannskna- og lkningatki,tv mtki etta sinn a vermti21 millj.kr.

rlega eru framkvmdar milli 10-11 sund mskoanir fsturgreiningardeild Landsptalans og hverju ri greinast 50 til 70 fsturgallar og skiptir mli a hafa gan tkjabna.

tt eftirlit er me fstrum sem eiga erfitt uppdrttar murkvii m.a. vegna vaxtarseinkunar ea veikinda mur. (Mbl.is)

N getur ori veruleg framfr essum efnum, en frttatilkynningu fr Landsptalanum segir a "nju tkin auveld(i) til muna flknari mskoanir, lkt og blflimlingar bi naflastreng og kolli fsturs ar sem tkin eru mun betri en au sem fyrir voru." veri auk ess hgt a fjlga skounarstofum r fimm sex me tilkomu nju tkjanna. Mbl.is segir fr.

En me sorglega reynslu huga, .e. af mrgum mskounum sustu ratuga, ar sem upplsingar um vissa veikleika og galla hinum fddu, ekki szt Downs-heilkennis-einstaklingum, er elilegt a menn hafi hyggjur af v, hvernig arna verur fari me tknina. Verur hn notu gu lfsins, til a hjlpa og lkna, ea stendur enn til a leita uppi meinta galla hinumfddu --eins og sem eir grimmustu myndu telja koma fram essari fallegu persnu-- og til ess san a svipta vikomandi lfi, jafnvel me kvalafullum htti?

J, etta sastnefnda hefur veri stunda Landsptala slands um langt rabil, unz n er svo komi, a langflestum Downs-brnum er ar "eytt" (sj efnisflokks-tengilinn hr near til a lesa fleiri greinar um a), jafnvel svo, a a er ori landi og j til skammar og opinbers hnjs erlendum fjlmilum!

En hvernig tekur t.d. kirkjan essum mlum? Str kirkjusamflg eins og au kalsku og hvtasunnukirkjan, samtals me um 1800 milljnir melima, hafa lst yfir samstu sinni me eim fddu. En hva um "jkirkjuna okkar", hefur hn aga um mli?

Nei, a hefur hn ekki.essi var einrma samykkt Kirkjuings 1988:

"Rtturinn til lfs er frumatrii allra mannrttinda. krfu verur a gera til rkisvaldsins, a a verndi mannlegt lf og efli meal almennings vitundina um mannhelgi.
Lggjf, sem raun gerir hi fdda lf rttlaust, brtur gegn v grundvallarsjnarmii kristindmsins,a srhver einstaklingur eigi rtt til lfs, allt fr upphafi og anga til dauinn ber a dyrum me elilegum ea viranlegum htti..."

Og skjlum sama Kirkjuings ri 1987, .e. greinarger me ofangreindri samykkt, segir smuleiis orrtt:

"Kirkjuing telur v brna nausyn bera til, a lg kvei um frihelgi mannlegs lfs, tryggi rtt ess jafnt fyrir sem eftir fingu."

Og ekki ng me a, heldur einnig etta:

"Legvatnsrannsknir og kannanir standi fsturs m ekki framkvma ru augnamii en v a vera a lii, lkna, s ess rf og a mgulegt. Hitt m aldrei vaka fyrir a svipta barni lfi, virist eitthva a."

J, etta er yfirlst stefna jkirkjunnar, og hjkrunarflk og lknar mttu gjarnan hafa a huga, ekki sur en foreldrar. Fyrst tti reyndar skyldan a brenna yfirstjrn jkirkjunnar a halda essari lfsverndar-stefnumtun lofti, og a vi um biskupa hennar rum fremur, vilji eir teljast marktkir siferislegri leisgn. Slveig Lra, vgslubiskup Hlum, hefur reyndar bi flagsvettvangi ( Lfsvon, samtkum til verndar fddum brnum) og skrifum snumunni beinlnis gu fddra.

En hva um Agnesi Sigurardttur, biskup slands? Af henni er sorgarsgu a segja, a hn hefur opinberlega brugizt bi fddum brnum og sinni eigin jkirkju, .e.a.s. stefnumtun bi Kirkjuings og Prestastefnu essu mli. Um a geta menn sannfrzt me v a lesa essa hrikalegu samantekt um skelfilegar yfirlsingar Agnesar.

JVJ.


mbl.is Gfu fsturgreiningardeild tv mtki
Tilkynna um vieigandi tengingu vi frtt

Formleg stefna jkirkjunnar um fstureyingar

essi var einrma samykkt Kirkjuings 1988:

"Rtturinn til lfs er frumatrii allra mannrttinda. krfu verur a gera til rkisvaldsins, a a verndi mannlegt lf og efli meal almennings vitundina um mannhelgi.
Lggjf, sem raun gerir hi fdda lf rttlaust, brtur gegn v grundvallarsjnarmii kristindmsins,a srhver einstaklingur eigi rtt til lfs, allt fr upphafi og anga til dauinn ber a dyrum me elilegum ea viranlegum htti.
Kirkjuing skrskotar til frumvarpa um breytingu lgum nr. 25 fr 22. ma 1975 og lgum nr. 67/1971 me ornum breytingum, sem flutt hafa veri, og frumvarps sem boa er.
Vill Kirkjuing skora Alingi a breyta umrddum lgum veru, a frihelgi mannlegs lfs s viurkennd."

Og skjlum sama Kirkjuings ri 1987, .e. greinarger me ofangreindri samykkt, segir smuleiis orrtt:

"Kirkjuing telur v brna nausyn bera til, a lg kvei um frihelgi mannlegs lfs, tryggi rtt ess jafnt fyrir sem eftir fingu."

Og ekki ng me a, heldur einnig etta:

"Legvatnsrannsknir og kannanir standi fsturs m ekki framkvma ru augnamii en v a vera a lii, lkna, s ess rf og a mgulegt. Hitt m aldrei vaka fyrir a svipta barni lfi, virist eitthva a." (etta snir, a Kirkjuing var EKKI aeins a verja fstur ea fdd brn, sem send eru dauann "af flagslegum stum", og hin ltin liggja btt hj gari, .e. varin. jkirkjan vill me essari samykkt verja au lka, sem ftlu kunna a vera. JVJ.)

Prestastefnaslands, sem lauk Langholtskirkju24. jn 1988, tk undir essa lyktun kirkjuings 1987 varandi lg um fstureyingar.

En n eru reyndar allmargir jkirkjumenn,jafnvel lklegustum stum, sem vira essar samykktir eirra eigin kirkju! Sj nnar hr:http://krist.blog.is/blog/krist/entry/1455763/

Hva er n til ra fyrir lfsverndarsinnaa menn landinu? Komi me ykkar hugmyndir!


Vivrun gegn tillgu Mannrttindanefnd S um a skylda jir til fstureyinga og lknardrpa

WARNING: a UN Committee to Impose Abortion and Euthanasia

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE - GENEVA

The Right to Life is Not the Right to Kill

The UN Human Rights Committee is currently revising the definition of the right to life in international law. It contemplates imposing on every State the legalisation of abortion, of assisted suicide and of euthanasia, in the very name of the right to life!

These lobbies of the culture of Death are about to win a decisive victory, in the greatest discretion. The final text will be adopted in the upcoming months. It is still possible to stop this manoeuvre. Support the action of the ECLJ before the Committee inco-signing the pleadingthat it will submit andin sharing this alert.

Like https://www.facebook.com/ECLJOfficial/ on Facebook

Why is it serious?

This Committee, composed of 18 experts, is in charge of writing an official interpretation of the dispositions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966). This interpretation, called general comment, has a considerable power on legislators and national jurisdictions for this Committee also has the power to judge the States on their respect of this treaty.

Thedraft on general commentstates that access to abortion is a right under Article 6 of the Covenant, even though it stipulates thatEvery human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

In doing so, the draft on general comment denies any protection to human life before birth and urges the 168 State Parties to the Covenant to legalise abortion on demand. The text gives no real condition or time limit to the right to access to abortion which should be available as soon as carrying the pregnancy would cause the woman substantial pain or suffering, whether physical or mental. Moreover, the draft condemns, without defining them, the requirements that States impose to legally access abortion insofar as they would be humiliating or unreasonably burdensome. The draft also reckons that States have the obligation to ensure access for adolescents to the use of contraceptive methods as a means to better preserve the health of women against the risks caused by abortion.

In aprevious version of 2015, the text recognized at least that States could adopt measures aiming at protecting the potential human life or the dignity of unborn children. Abortion was hence still a form of exception. But the majority of the committee decided in March 2016 to remove any reference to the child, reckoning, according to one of its members, that it did not appear necessary to mention the right to life of the foetus, as if human life started but at birth!

One must yet note that this text does not reflect the convictions of all members of the Committee, far from it! The discussions among the Committee show on the contrary that this project is more the work of an active minority. It is thus possible to have it modified.

What the ECLJ believes

This general comment is an obvious try to impose obligations that the majority of States have constantly refused. Even more, these new obligations are opposed to the text of the Covenant and the intention of the States that wrote and adopted it.

Sign our petition to fight back

In 1947, the writers of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), of which the Covenant of 1966 is ensued, discussed the beginning of the right to life. While it was proposed to guarantee thatEveryone has the right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception regardless of his or her physical or mental condition, the People's Republic of China, supported by the United Kingdom and the USSR obtained that the practice of abortion be tolerated. The Universal Declaration could then be interpreted as protecting, or not, life from conception, but never as imposing the legalization of abortion. The Covenant incidentally prohibits death penalty for pregnant women out of respect for the life of the child.

Since then, the majority of States has constantly rejected the Western attempts aiming at asserting the existence of a universal right to abortion, notably during the conferences on population, development and women in Cairo and Beijing.

The current draft on general comment is thus opposed to the intention of the writers of the Covenant, to the will of States and even to the letter of the treaty. It is also hardly compatible with numerous other international treaties.

How can one logically deduce a right to death from the right to life?The European Court of Human Rights already declared that impossible in 2002.

How can one ignore the life and humanity of an unborn child?Even the European Court never declared the existence of a right to abortion nor totally denied the unborn child the quality of human person and the protection guaranteed by it.

This project is critical because it renounces to recognize the veryexistenceof human life before birth, leaving it without protection towards abortion and all forms of manipulation and exploitation, notably biotechnological. It is also sadly revealing that the draft says little or nothing about the protection of women who wish to give birth to their children, nor on infant health and even less on the obligation made to States to prevent the recourse to abortion.

This text shows a critical decline of the protection of the right to life.

Its infuriating. If we dont act, millions more babies will die.

Yet we have a voice. As a Non-Governmental Organization holding special Consultative Status before the United Nations (ECOSOC), the ECLJ will submit a written memorandum to the Human Rights Committee, on the 6thof October, on the last day to submit contributions.

Our U.N. deadline is looming. We urgently need your voice now to reinforce this memorandum.

We invite you tomassively support it bysigning here before the 6thof October.

We will give the Committee the number of signatures received to support our memorandum (without your name).

The members of the Committee in favour of the right to life need our support and encouragement!

Thank you.

Sign our Petition now


Um bloggi

Lífsréttur

Höfundur

Lífsréttur
Lífsréttur

Information service about life issues – upplýsingaþjónusta um lífsverndarmál lifsrettur@yahoo.com - sjá nánar á höfundarsíðu (an English summary too). +netfang/e-mail: jvjensson@gmail.com

Sept. 2017
S M M F F L
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Njustu myndir

  • ..._13_1299472
  • 1178324855adb16
  • IMG_0734
  • 11739650 10205367658365521 962682710 n
  • prolife7

Heimsknir

Flettingar

  • dag (14.12.): 1
  • Sl. slarhring: 2
  • Sl. viku: 12
  • Fr upphafi: 24367

Anna

  • Innlit dag: 1
  • Innlit sl. viku: 10
  • Gestir dag: 1
  • IP-tlur dag: 1

Uppfrt 3 mn. fresti.
Skringar

Innskrning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveiki Javascript til a hefja innskrningu.

Hafu samband